After carefully analyzing and weighing out the criteria of adequacy between our three hypotheses, the group has decided that our original claim is still the best hypothesis.
In comparison, both our original claim and AH#1 contain the criteria needed to be feasible hypotheses for our research, while AH#2 does not. AH#2 is not discussing radiation emissions, but rather, where and how to stop them, which doesn't relate to our original claim as directly as the other.
Our original claim fulfills the criteria of adequacy by not making too many assumptions, and by allowing itself to be tested many times by different scientists and organizations. Although there is no concrete proof of our claim, experts agree that the population of the world should be wary about their cell phone use and caution against holding a cell phone to your head for long periods of time.
We all conclude that our original claim is the strongest and best for analyzing cellular devices and their emissions of radiation being harmful to the population.
